NON – FARM INCOME, PRODUCTIVITY AND WELFARE STATUS OF YAM-BASED FARMING HOUSEHOLDS IN SOUTHWEST, NIGERIA.
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The study examined the Non - Farm Income, Productivity and Welfare Status of the Yam-Based
Farming Households in Southwest, Nigeria. The objectives of the study were to: identify the types
of non-farm activities engaged by the farmers, the reasons for their engagement and the extent of
contributions to total household income; determine the factors that influence yam- based farming
households’ decision to participate in non-farm income activities; evaluate the level of productivity
of the yam- based farming households; assess the welfare status of the farmers; and estimate the
effect of non- farm income and productivity on welfare status of farmers in the study area. Primary
data used in the study were obtained from 345 respondents selected through a multistage sampling
procedure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, probit regression model, total factor
productivity, fuzzy set theory and two stage least square. The result of the study showed that
majority of the respondents (93.7%) were 60 years or less old with an average age of 46years
which indicated that the farmers were in their economically active age. The study also showed that
yam production was dominated by married men who were highly experienced and educated. The
majority of the farmers engaged in one or more non- farm income activities. Some of the activities
were; bricklaying, tailoring, restaurant dealer, iron works, teaching and others. The farmers had
one or more reasons for participating in non-farm activities. The study also showed that non-farm
income activities contributed about 50.77% to total household income of the yam – based farmers
in the study area. The probit regression model result of the factors influencing the decision of the
yam- based farming households to participate in non-farm income activities revealed that out of
eleven included variables only four variables of education status, household size, access to social
amenities and closeness to urban center positively influenced the decision to participate in nonfarm income activities while sex, farm size and access to credit facilities though significant negatively affected the probability of
participating in non-farm income by the farmers. The distribution of the Total Factor Productivity
(TFP) indicated that, 170(52.17%) ,54(17.39%) and 96(30.44%) of the respondents have TFP >1,
TFP =1 and TFP<1 respectively. The fuzzy set result revealed that the capability to attain a desired
state of welfare was highest with respect to ownership of economic asset and lowest with respect
to security. Based on the welfare indexing for the elementary indicators of the welfare dimensions,
the composite welfare index for farmers in the study area by the fuzzy logic aggregation was
estimated at 0.2270. This indicates that the capability of the farmers to attain the valued capabilities
set available to them is approximately 22.70%. The multidimensional welfare status index
threshold was set at 0.5 with 36.47% of the farming households attaining state of better welfare
status. The result of the two stage least square (2SLS) using total factor productivity index and
non-farm income as instrumental variables on effect of non- farm income and productivity on the
welfare status of the farmers showed positive relationship between the non-farm income and
agricultural productivity on welfare status. The study recommends the promotion of non-farm
employment as a good strategy for supplementing the income of yam –based farming households
as well as sustaining equitable growth among rural households in Nigeria because non-farm
income was not only a source of income for the participating households but a source of investment
fund to boost agricultural productivity.